MG(TX) GERALD “JAKE” BETTY
TEXAS STATE GUARD
MG(TX) GERALD “JAKE” BETTY
TEXAS STATE GUARD
LTC(MD) EDWARD HUBNER
Benefits of a State Guard, State Defense Force
Across the country, the American populous has become increasingly concerned over how they can protect their families and personal property in the event of a Hurricane Katrina-type natural disaster or man-made terrorists attacks on schools, shopping malls, restaurants, sporting events and any number of other soft or hard targets.
These tell the story that many Americans don’t want to rely on bureaucratic agencies hundreds of miles way to come rescue them in times of disaster.
State Guards (also known as State Defense Forces) – in helping to augment the National Guard and state emergency management agencies, have left not only a fascinating footprint in American history, they are an integral force multiplier for today’s homeland security efforts.
Much has been written about the 18th century “state militias” that played noteworthy – if not deciding – roles in the outcome of America’s defeat of the British Army.
Yet little is known about how prominent these citizen patriots have been in the present day and – like their progenitors – volunteer and train most often without pay to defend and protect their homes and local communities.
As America entered World War I, some 300,000 National Guard members were called to federal service – most to fight overseas. This left many states void of one of the most critical means of responding to local/state disasters.
In the Dec. 2004 edition of the Joint Center for Operational Analysis Journal – and republished in Dec. 2009 by the U.S. Army Combined Arms Center, Center for Army Lessons Learned – COL (Ret) John R. Brinkerhoff wrote specifically about how State Guards stepped-in to fill critical gaps during World War I.
He noted that just months after Congress enacted the Home Defense Act (June 1917), there were State Guard units in 42 states with an aggregate strength of 100,000.
However, once the war was over, Congress withdrew authorization for these units.
A 2010 Heritage Foundation survey, “The 21st-century militia: State defense forces and homeland security,” highlighted that leading up to World War II Congress similarly authorized the formation of State Guards, resulting in a total enrollment of some 150,000 members.
While Congress again withdrew this authorization after the war, State Guards were reinstated in 1950 during hostilities in Korea.
Finally, in 1955, permanent authorization was passed, establishing the State Guards we see in existence today.
By 1969, the Gates Commission recommended what was called the “Total Force Concept,” to replace conscription – better known as “the draft” – with the all-volunteer military.
As the Total Force Concept increased the likelihood of Reserve and National Guard units being called to federal duty, many policy makers realized the importance of State Guards in providing security and emergency response back home.
THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR
State Guard forces can assist locally in a disaster well before any Federal response could be coordinated.
For many years, State Guards stood ready to provide protection for armories, or as “Honor Guards” for local events or military funerals, when National Guard personnel were unavailable.
As National Guard units were called to serve overseas in the Global War on Terror, State Guards were once again realized as an important force multiplier in state emergency management.
In most states, after the 9/11 attacks, State Guard mission sets increased their focus on local emergency response, disaster recovery, and critical infrastructure protection.
Though National Guard units have returned home with the draw-down of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, continuing conflicts and threats from across the globe – including expanding terrorist threats – prove that things are in no sense “back to normal.”
A Department of Defense report entitled, “Evaluation of Department of Defense Interaction with State Defense forces” by the U.S. Deputy Inspector General, Special Plans and Operations, found that in April 2014, 23 states and Puerto Rico maintained State Guards with an estimated strength of 14,000.
Just months after this report, Arizona became the 25th state or territory to organize a State Guard.
Hurricane Katrina clearly proved that – while local law enforcement is responsible for maintaining law and order – catastrophic events can quickly overwhelm local resources.
While state governors can call on federal aid and support, trained State Guard personnel – already stationed within the state – can respond much more quickly than federal resources, which can be bureaucratically slow to respond.
State Guard units can bring communication options into an area affected by disaster.
Statewide catastrophes – whether natural or man-made – will require personnel trained in emergency management response and recovery, including roadway evacuation support, the logistics of food distribution and emergency shelters, local security, damage assessment, and even urban, wilderness and water search and rescue.
The 2010 Heritage Foundation survey – purportedly the first attempt by any organization to conduct a comprehensive survey of the nation’s State Guards – found that State Guard members from at least eight states responded to assist with Katrina recovery efforts.
A 2012 Heritage Foundation report entitled, “Why more states should establish state defense forces,” found that Katrina wiped out some 2,000 cell phone towers and destroyed both land line and 911 services.
The report highlighted the communication capabilities of the South Carolina State Guard which had, “two mobile communications trailers, containing radios capable of high frequency, VHF/UHF and general mobile radio service (GMRS) transmission, in addition to air-to-ground radio capabilities (and) repeater systems.”
RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING
The 2010 Heritage survey further found that the average age of a State Guard member is 42 years.
The 2005, “A guide for establishing a state defense force with a homeland security mission,” for the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, attributed the seemingly advanced age of members to a large number of former or retired members of the armed forces.
As it noted, many veterans serve in State Guards because of, “the comfort level obtained from being among uniformed persons once again, or because of having served the military well and received much in return wish to ‘repay’ that emotional ‘debt’ through continued community service…”
Still, while many younger State Guard members (ages 17-30) may have chosen not to join the armed forces, the State Guard satisfies the desires of those who feel called to serve their state or local community.
As State Guards are designed for state disaster “response and recovery” rather than “combat,” they tend to have less stringent physical fitness requirements than federal armed forces. This often allows those with minor medical issues to serve in many important capacities.
Still, many units may desire at least some young, more physically fit members to serve on quick responding search and rescue or damage assessment teams.
It is reasonable to expect State Guards to rely increasingly on both seasoned veterans as well as young, eager, more physically fit members.
With ongoing – and growing – concerns over budget cuts and overall fiscal responsibilities at the local, state and federal levels, the increased reliance of low-cost, quick-responding State Guard’s present as a no-brainier.
In recognizing the unpredictably volatile potential of both natural and man-made disasters, we do a disservice to our communities if we do not stand ready with highly trained emergency management volunteers who can place “boots on the ground” in a matter of hours, rather than days or weeks.
Many of us know all too well that the heart of emergency response is “local.” We understand the importance of a ready, local preparedness in the event of a catastrophic event. No one wants to see members of their own community stranded on rooftops with no one to come rescue them for days.
For anyone concerned about his or her own family safety, the safety of their community, those looking into “prepping,” or those simply wanting to give aid and assistance to their local community, when local resources become overwhelmed, perhaps one of the most efficient responses includes our own State Guards.
About the author: Keith Pounds is a former hospital corpsman (medic) having served in the U.S. Navy and with the Marines. In 2012, he was designated as an Honorary Green Beret by the S.C. Chapter of the Special Forces Association. He holds an MBA with a concentration in organizational psychology and is the president and CEO of Countercon, a Columbia, S.C.-based counter-terrorism consulting company, and serves as a captain in the S.C. State Guard.
At the 2015 Annual Conference in Baltimore, MD, September 2015, the SGAUS Board unanimously selected the 2016-2017 President of SGAUS.
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE GUARD COMMANDER
MAJOR GENERAL THOMAS S. MULLIKIN
At the last SGAUS Board meeting in Sacramento, CA, on 25 April 2016, two new SGAUS Vice-Presidents were unanimously elected to serve the Association and all State Defense Force soldiers. We are grateful for their willingness to serve.
NEW YORK GUARD COMMANDER
BRIGADIER GENERAL STEPHEN A. BUCARIA
TEXAS STATE GUARD COMMANDER
MAJOR GENERAL GERALD “JAKE” BETTY
MG(SC) THOMAS S. MULLIKIN
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE GUARD
The following is recommended for consideration and vote at the 2016 Annual Convention:
a. Section 1. General. In each state, commonwealth, or territory in which there is organized a State Guard, State Defense Force, State Military Reserve, or other militia organization, which is officially recognized, responsive to state authority and responsive to the State Guard Commander, and which is satisfactory to the Board of Directors, such organization shall be eligible for membership in this Association as a State Chapter. There shall be no more than one State Chapter per state or territory. The internal organization and operations of State Chapters shall be the prerogative of the chapter. However, only members who are active and in good standing in the same recognized State Guard or State Defense Force may hold office in the same.
b. Article III, Section 3. Voting Rights. The State Chapters in good standing shall cast votes by Delegates at any Association meeting. Each State Chapter in good standing shall have one (1) in the election of Directors, amendments of By-Laws, the adoption of Resolutions, and such other matters as may be referred to the States for action by the Board.
c. Chapter fees raised to $50.
The Texas State Guard, in support of civil authorities, assisted in establishing safe shelters for evacuated flood victims in the south-eastern region of the state, March 14-21, 2016. “We have a total of 18 soldiers from the State Guard here to supplement the Red Cross in any way they need us. They run the shelter, and we support their efforts,” said Sgt. Christopher T. Riehle, recruiter, 3rd Battalion, 8th Regiment. “We train closely with the Red Cross and other agencies to make sure we are prepared for something like this.” The Texas State Guard trains annually to remain proficient in the duties they per-form while called upon during disaster relief missions. Some of the emergency response training includes shelter management, search and rescue, emergency communications, mass care and medical support. “We assist with setting up the shelter, but it could be anything from moving tables to providing security or just talking to the clients that are here,” said Staff Sgt. Nick B. Martinez, 2nd Battalion, 8th Regiment.
“Just being able to help is a great reward.” Guardsmen ran 24-hour operations at the shelter to ensure anyone in need was equipped with immediate support. “At our peak we had about 170 clients that needed our help,” said Shelter Manager Marie Killingsworth, American Red Cross Volunteer. “The Soldiers have been here since the beginning. I love that they are so flexible, and can move at the drop of a dime.”
The Texas State Guard assisted with supporting three other safety shelters, two of which were evacuated due to flood concerns and consolidated in Beaumont. “This is now the fourth shelter we have been a part of and we are fully trained to do what it takes to help,” said Riehle. “The best part is when the clients thank us for being here because they know they’re going to get the help that they need.” The Texas Military Department activated more than 150 service members from the Texas Army National Guard and the Texas State Guard during severe flooding in Orange, Newton and Jasper counties. They provided swift water rescue support to emergency first responders, rescuing and evacuating 410 people from the floods, and supported shelter operations, providing basic necessities to hundreds of people in need.
On 13 March 2016, soldiers from the 65th Emergency Response Regiment (ERR), New York Guard in conjunction with elements of the New York Army National Guard 152nd ESC (Engineer Support Company) conducted another round of Joint road clearing operations at Youngstown Local Training Area (YLTA) in Ransomville, NY.
The 65th ERR provided three chainsaw teams, who assisted in the clearing of downed trees that were blocking the roads at the Youngstown training area. The trees and debris were then removed by elements of the NYARNG 152nd ESC.
The joint training and cleaning exercise gave both old and new soldiers of the 65th ERR a chance to get more practice and experience to work with their chainsaws and the opportunity to work side by side with their New York Army National Guard Engineer counterparts. The training and exercise was a valuable experience to the soldiers of the New York Guard, as it helped them to keep their skills fresh in debris removal, and gave them the opportunity to train with their National Guard counterparts in the 152nd ESC NYARNG.
START by clicking link below for registration instructions:
Selection as the SGAUS Soldier, NCO, and Officer of the Year is an exceptional honor for the Soldier selected but also a responsibility, as the Soldier selected will represent SGAUS for a year as the best of the best SGAUS has to offer. Therefore this selection should not be taken lightly or without due consideration. The Soldier selected for this honor must be one who consistently displays exception dedication, professionalism, performance, military bearing and appearance. For more information, please refer to this link … 2016 SGAUS Soldier-NCO-Officer of the Year Program