MG(TX) GERALD “JAKE” BETTY
TEXAS STATE GUARD
MG(TX) GERALD “JAKE” BETTY
TEXAS STATE GUARD
LTC(MD) EDWARD HUBNER
Benefits of a State Guard, State Defense Force
Across the country, the American populous has become increasingly concerned over how they can protect their families and personal property in the event of a Hurricane Katrina-type natural disaster or man-made terrorists attacks on schools, shopping malls, restaurants, sporting events and any number of other soft or hard targets.
These tell the story that many Americans don’t want to rely on bureaucratic agencies hundreds of miles way to come rescue them in times of disaster.
State Guards (also known as State Defense Forces) – in helping to augment the National Guard and state emergency management agencies, have left not only a fascinating footprint in American history, they are an integral force multiplier for today’s homeland security efforts.
Much has been written about the 18th century “state militias” that played noteworthy – if not deciding – roles in the outcome of America’s defeat of the British Army.
Yet little is known about how prominent these citizen patriots have been in the present day and – like their progenitors – volunteer and train most often without pay to defend and protect their homes and local communities.
As America entered World War I, some 300,000 National Guard members were called to federal service – most to fight overseas. This left many states void of one of the most critical means of responding to local/state disasters.
In the Dec. 2004 edition of the Joint Center for Operational Analysis Journal – and republished in Dec. 2009 by the U.S. Army Combined Arms Center, Center for Army Lessons Learned – COL (Ret) John R. Brinkerhoff wrote specifically about how State Guards stepped-in to fill critical gaps during World War I.
He noted that just months after Congress enacted the Home Defense Act (June 1917), there were State Guard units in 42 states with an aggregate strength of 100,000.
However, once the war was over, Congress withdrew authorization for these units.
A 2010 Heritage Foundation survey, “The 21st-century militia: State defense forces and homeland security,” highlighted that leading up to World War II Congress similarly authorized the formation of State Guards, resulting in a total enrollment of some 150,000 members.
While Congress again withdrew this authorization after the war, State Guards were reinstated in 1950 during hostilities in Korea.
Finally, in 1955, permanent authorization was passed, establishing the State Guards we see in existence today.
By 1969, the Gates Commission recommended what was called the “Total Force Concept,” to replace conscription – better known as “the draft” – with the all-volunteer military.
As the Total Force Concept increased the likelihood of Reserve and National Guard units being called to federal duty, many policy makers realized the importance of State Guards in providing security and emergency response back home.
THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR
State Guard forces can assist locally in a disaster well before any Federal response could be coordinated.
For many years, State Guards stood ready to provide protection for armories, or as “Honor Guards” for local events or military funerals, when National Guard personnel were unavailable.
As National Guard units were called to serve overseas in the Global War on Terror, State Guards were once again realized as an important force multiplier in state emergency management.
In most states, after the 9/11 attacks, State Guard mission sets increased their focus on local emergency response, disaster recovery, and critical infrastructure protection.
Though National Guard units have returned home with the draw-down of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, continuing conflicts and threats from across the globe – including expanding terrorist threats – prove that things are in no sense “back to normal.”
A Department of Defense report entitled, “Evaluation of Department of Defense Interaction with State Defense forces” by the U.S. Deputy Inspector General, Special Plans and Operations, found that in April 2014, 23 states and Puerto Rico maintained State Guards with an estimated strength of 14,000.
Just months after this report, Arizona became the 25th state or territory to organize a State Guard.
Hurricane Katrina clearly proved that – while local law enforcement is responsible for maintaining law and order – catastrophic events can quickly overwhelm local resources.
While state governors can call on federal aid and support, trained State Guard personnel – already stationed within the state – can respond much more quickly than federal resources, which can be bureaucratically slow to respond.
State Guard units can bring communication options into an area affected by disaster.
Statewide catastrophes – whether natural or man-made – will require personnel trained in emergency management response and recovery, including roadway evacuation support, the logistics of food distribution and emergency shelters, local security, damage assessment, and even urban, wilderness and water search and rescue.
The 2010 Heritage Foundation survey – purportedly the first attempt by any organization to conduct a comprehensive survey of the nation’s State Guards – found that State Guard members from at least eight states responded to assist with Katrina recovery efforts.
A 2012 Heritage Foundation report entitled, “Why more states should establish state defense forces,” found that Katrina wiped out some 2,000 cell phone towers and destroyed both land line and 911 services.
The report highlighted the communication capabilities of the South Carolina State Guard which had, “two mobile communications trailers, containing radios capable of high frequency, VHF/UHF and general mobile radio service (GMRS) transmission, in addition to air-to-ground radio capabilities (and) repeater systems.”
RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING
The 2010 Heritage survey further found that the average age of a State Guard member is 42 years.
The 2005, “A guide for establishing a state defense force with a homeland security mission,” for the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, attributed the seemingly advanced age of members to a large number of former or retired members of the armed forces.
As it noted, many veterans serve in State Guards because of, “the comfort level obtained from being among uniformed persons once again, or because of having served the military well and received much in return wish to ‘repay’ that emotional ‘debt’ through continued community service…”
Still, while many younger State Guard members (ages 17-30) may have chosen not to join the armed forces, the State Guard satisfies the desires of those who feel called to serve their state or local community.
As State Guards are designed for state disaster “response and recovery” rather than “combat,” they tend to have less stringent physical fitness requirements than federal armed forces. This often allows those with minor medical issues to serve in many important capacities.
Still, many units may desire at least some young, more physically fit members to serve on quick responding search and rescue or damage assessment teams.
It is reasonable to expect State Guards to rely increasingly on both seasoned veterans as well as young, eager, more physically fit members.
With ongoing – and growing – concerns over budget cuts and overall fiscal responsibilities at the local, state and federal levels, the increased reliance of low-cost, quick-responding State Guard’s present as a no-brainier.
In recognizing the unpredictably volatile potential of both natural and man-made disasters, we do a disservice to our communities if we do not stand ready with highly trained emergency management volunteers who can place “boots on the ground” in a matter of hours, rather than days or weeks.
Many of us know all too well that the heart of emergency response is “local.” We understand the importance of a ready, local preparedness in the event of a catastrophic event. No one wants to see members of their own community stranded on rooftops with no one to come rescue them for days.
For anyone concerned about his or her own family safety, the safety of their community, those looking into “prepping,” or those simply wanting to give aid and assistance to their local community, when local resources become overwhelmed, perhaps one of the most efficient responses includes our own State Guards.
About the author: Keith Pounds is a former hospital corpsman (medic) having served in the U.S. Navy and with the Marines. In 2012, he was designated as an Honorary Green Beret by the S.C. Chapter of the Special Forces Association. He holds an MBA with a concentration in organizational psychology and is the president and CEO of Countercon, a Columbia, S.C.-based counter-terrorism consulting company, and serves as a captain in the S.C. State Guard.
Maryland Defense Force Information Release
By Maj. Stephen Rice firstname.lastname@example.org
Members of the Maryland Defense Force (MDDF) and allied emergency response agencies (Howard County Police, Baltimore County Fire Service, & Prince Georges County CERT) recently completed a three-day, Hazardous Materials / WMD Operational Level training course presented by instructors from the Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX). Held at the MDDF headquarters, June 3rd, 4th, and 5th, 22 soldiers completed the training as a part of their MDDF Disaster Response Specialist – Basic Qualification.
The training prepares emergency responders to recognize and identify, assess, assist in the mitigation of hazardous materials situations through the development of defensive actions to prevent further contamination of people, property, and the environment. Through a combination of classroom and field exercises, the course focuses on the unique response and personal protection challenges that responders face during a Weapons of Mass Destruction / terrorist incident or a Hazardous Materials incident.
The course is based on nationally recognized standards (NFPA 472) and satisfies Operations-level core competencies and personal protective equipment, mission-specific competency providing compliance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 and EPA 40 CFR Part 311 response regulations. Through completion of this course and associated testing, students will obtain certification under the fire service, National Professional Qualifications Board (NPQS/Pro-Board) as Operations Level responders.
Volunteer State Guard Searches Turtle Creek for Body
The third battalion of the Texas State Guard was searching Turtle Creek this morning for the body of Mark McCullers, the SMU officer who went missing after being washed away by flood waters in July.
The volunteer military group planned to walk into the creek and try to bring up underbrush to find him, as part of their search and rescue training, but were impeded by the heavy rain.
Lt. Col. Richard Steele, the group’s commanding officer, said they were only able to search one area of interest, since the others were flooded.
They were not able to find anything, but Steele said “we’re going to continue to train in the community until all areas have been searched.”
Steele’s company of about 34 is a part of the Texas military forces, but they all serve on a volunteer basis. “Hopefully,” he said, “we can help bring some closure to the family.”
Water Survival Training
By Pvt. Oscar Cano, email@example.com
GSDF SGT Roger Boles of 1BDE / 3BN completes one of the many skill exercises required as part of the water survival training program. Georgia State Defense Force Photo.
SMYRNA, Georgia, July 16, 2016 – A group of 11 soldiers across different units of the Georgia State Defense Force (GSDF) recently participated in a water survival training course aimed to expand their skills when operating in or near bodies of water.
This type of training is conducted to build GSDF soldiers’ confidence for waterborne operations as well as to prepare troop leaders on how to operate around water, but most importantly, to teach them what protective measures are necessary to ensure the safety of every soldier around water.
Participants learned and demonstrated through a series of evolutions, several different skills needed to survive in waterborne activities. Examples included how to waterproof the rucksack, how to make water entries, maintaining buoyancy in full gear, use of personal safety and water survival techniques, how to assist other soldiers in the water and many others detailed in the Army’s TC 21-21 Water Survival Training. In addition, other GSDF specific topics related to water rescue were instructed, which included the proper rope throwing techniques to drowning victims in the water.
To counter the tendency of panicking when unexpectedly entering water — CW4 Lloyd Garrard, who was the lead course instructor with the assistance of MSG Wade Price — emphasized the use of the SAFE principle. Doing so, reminds soldiers of the fundamentals of swimming survival:
S – Slow, easy movement A – Apply natural buoyancy F – Full lung inflation E – Extreme relaxation
“The ability to survive if you fall into water wearing your uniform and gear as we perform Search and Rescue (SAR) operations is imperative” said CW4 Garrard who also was instrumental in the development of the course to GSDF soldiers.
CW4 Garrard also noted that “having fear and anxiety around water and during waterborne operations can be disastrous if it gets out of control, but successfully completing this program removes most of the fear of having a problem in or around water and builds confidence in our soldiers”. At the end of the day, all participating soldiers were able to execute with confidence several water survival techniques and learned many valuable lessons from the instructors. Upon completion of the course, SPC Jonathan Melko of 76th BDE / 911th BN said “It was one of the best training I have received in the GSDF”.
Both CW4 Garrard and MSG Price are currently assigned to GSDF G3’s office.
GSDF soldiers practice the “hanging float” as part of water survival training. This technique can be used while waiting for help to arrive and as a resting position when swimming to safety. Georgia State Defense Force Photo.
At the 2015 Annual Conference in Baltimore, MD, September 2015, the SGAUS Board unanimously selected the 2016-2017 President of SGAUS.
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE GUARD COMMANDER
MAJOR GENERAL THOMAS S. MULLIKIN
At the last SGAUS Board meeting in Sacramento, CA, on 25 April 2016, two new SGAUS Vice-Presidents were unanimously elected to serve the Association and all State Defense Force soldiers. We are grateful for their willingness to serve.
NEW YORK GUARD COMMANDER
BRIGADIER GENERAL STEPHEN A. BUCARIA
TEXAS STATE GUARD COMMANDER
MAJOR GENERAL GERALD “JAKE” BETTY
MG(SC) THOMAS S. MULLIKIN
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE GUARD
The following is recommended for consideration and vote at the 2016 Annual Convention:
a. Section 1. General. In each state, commonwealth, or territory in which there is organized a State Guard, State Defense Force, State Military Reserve, or other militia organization, which is officially recognized, responsive to state authority and responsive to the State Guard Commander, and which is satisfactory to the Board of Directors, such organization shall be eligible for membership in this Association as a State Chapter. There shall be no more than one State Chapter per state or territory. The internal organization and operations of State Chapters shall be the prerogative of the chapter. However, only members who are active and in good standing in the same recognized State Guard or State Defense Force may hold office in the same.
b. Article III, Section 3. Voting Rights. The State Chapters in good standing shall cast votes by Delegates at any Association meeting. Each State Chapter in good standing shall have one (1) in the election of Directors, amendments of By-Laws, the adoption of Resolutions, and such other matters as may be referred to the States for action by the Board.
c. Chapter fees raised to $50.